
Mike Moore scored 25 points in 29 minutes before fouling out of Wednesday's loss to Richmond. (Photo courtesy of Joe DiBari)
BY CHARLES COSTELLO
Though they were standing on the sideline sixty minutes before the start of Wednesday night’s game, Fordham’s Chris Bethel, Brenton Butler, and Trey Blue couldn’t have been further away from the court. Leaning against the scorer’s table wearing dress pants and ties, the three B’s could do little other than watch. This isn’t the way things were supposed to work out for the talented, yet at times frustrating, ballplayers. But it’s been that kind of a year for the Rams.
Bethel (knee) and Butler (ankle), two veterans Fordham was counting on this season, are done for the year, and it looks like the same can be said for Blue, who has left the team twice for personal reasons in what’s been a very trying season for the freshman guard. So the Rams entered Wednesday’s game against the Richmond Spiders already shorthanded, with just 10 players dressing for the Atlantic 10 contest. Then, in what seemed like a game of dominos, Jacob Green, Herb Tanner, and Mike Moore fouled out midway through the second half. That would eventually leave the Rams with a bench consisting of just Ryan Hage, a walk-on, and Lamar Thomas, a rarely used freshman. Fordham finished the game with just four scholarship players available.
“I was a little worried that I might have to play tonight,” Fordham head coach Dereck Whittenburg said after the game. “We were in so much foul trouble. We’re kind of down numbers. [Even] with three guys fouling out of the game, we still had our chances. We just can’t quite get over the hump and make that big play. And at the end (Richmond) made some terrific plays and closed the game out.
“But there were some positives. We finally got our shooting together a little bit. Once again it’s the same old story: Our productivity offensively. We had two guys in double figures. We’re looking for that third and we just didn’t get it tonight. And then [we had] entirely too many turnovers tonight and that really got us at the end.” (Fordham turned the ball over 17 times.)
With that said, the Rams still put up a fight. In fact, this was by far Fordham’s best effort since their win over St. Bonaventure back on Jan. 28. After six disappointing losses in a row, where the Rams were blown out in each contest, the team needed this one. And the fact that they did it shorthanded, in a season that has delivered one punch after another, makes the 78-68 defeat to Richmond one of the easier losses of the year to stomach for the 3-22 Rams.
Against the Spiders (15-13, 7-6), the Rams shot the ball well, a season-high 52.2 percent from the floor and 16-of-20 (80 percent) from the free-throw line. The Rams outscored Richmond 38-30 in the paint, and they were only outrebounded 31-24. Both teams committed 23 personal fouls, but the Spiders had 31 chances at the charity stripe, to Fordham’s 20. Fordham’s bench, or what’s left of it, was outscored by Richmond’s by a margin of 29-9.
“A lot more bright spots,” was how Whittenburg described his team’s performance. “Our defense was okay at times. I just think we missed a lot of key blockouts. [With] those little fundamental things, that’s when the youth comes in. Now we’re getting a little closer, now we’re shooting the ball well, but now we have to do the fundamental things like the key blockouts, making layups, and not fouling. If we can do those things maybe we can get a little closer and get a win here.”
After trailing by as many as 16 points in the second half, and never having the lead in this game, Fordham made a couple of spirited runs in the second half, getting as close as nine points on several occasions. But Richmond relied on the scorinig of Kevin Anderson (18 points), David Gonzalvez (17 points), and Justin Harper (14 points) to hold on for the win.
“We’ve got to make a shot, make a play, and then we’ve got to come down and play solid defense,” Whittenburg said of his team’s comeback attempt. “At the end it’s all predicated on our confidence. You’ve got to make that shot. The difference in the game when it got to the end was that they had a couple guys that just finished the game for them. And that’s what we need, for guys to step up and make those plays. That’s the difference in the game, especially at the end.”
For Fordham, Mike Moore followed up a 28-point effort against Rhode Island by scoring a game-high 25 points. And Jio Fontan continued his impressive play by scoring 18 points, shooting 7-of-15 from the field. Fontan also turned in the effort play of the night when he dove over the scorer’s table going after a loose ball in the second half. This for a freshman who is already playing with a hurt right shoulder. For the Rams, that play exemplified the no-quit attitude the team brought to the Rose Hill Gym Wednesday night.
The Rams are now 1-12 in conference play with three games remaining. Saturday they will travel to Charlotte for a 2 p.m. game against the 49ers . Then it’s off to La Salle next Wednesday night and back to Rose Hill for the season finale next Saturday against Saint Joseph’s. The Atlantic 10 tournament begins on Wednesday, March 11 in Atlantic City. It’s now official: Fordham will be sitting this one out.
Whittenburg Deserves Praise, Not Criticism, for Comments in Daily News Article
Posted by Fordham SportsNet on February 20, 2009
BY CHARLES COSTELLO
WFUV’s pregame interview Wednesday with Fordham head coach Dereck Whittenburg was one of the most highly anticipated of the year. Following last weekend’s New York Daily News article chronicling Fordham’s struggles in the Atlantic 10 (Fordham basketball nearing 14th straight year of pain in Atlantic 10), I would’ve liked to have heard more from Whittenburg about his thoughts on the story. But a pregame interview lasting three or four minutes, and taking place a couple hours before a conference game, isn’t the place for an in-depth discussion like that to take place. The focus, rightfully so, was on that night’s game against Temple.
Here’s what Whittenburg did say on WFUV when asked about the Daily News story:
“I think the morale with us is fine. We know our future is bright. We understand we’re going through a tough time but we’re not going to panic. We’ve got some good talent coming in [next year]. We have a chance to get in the conference tournament and that’s what we’re focused on.
“I think we’re getting some support. I think our administration has been supporting us. I’m humbled for the opportunity [to coach at Fordham].”
No follow up questions. Pretty standard answers.
Back to the article that got the basketball buzz going at Rose Hill. Whittenburg deserves credit for saying what he did. He was honest. And his remarks were right on. When asked by the Daily News whether Fordham was in over its head playing in the A-10, Whittenburg said, “I think that’s a question for the administration. To be honest with you, I don’t know why they’re in the A-10.”
Correct me if I’m wrong, but haven’t Fordham fans been searching for answers from the administration for the past 14 years. And year after year, they’re frustrated by what they perceive to be the general apathy of the big shots at the university. Seems like a pretty fair comment to me.
When asked if the Rose Hill Gym hindered Fordham’s ability to recruit players, Whittenburg said, “No question. It’s a disadvantage. We have to be honest here, the joke is over. It was a great tradition in this gym. (But) when a guy comes and sees our gym and a guy comes and sees Rhode Island’s gym or he goes and sees Xavier’s, it’s not even a question of what he’s going to like more.”
I’m willing to bet that all Fordham fans agree that the basketball program needs a new arena with better facilities.
And when asked about Fordham’s high academic standards, Whittenburg said, “We have a very good academic school in this league. One of the best. If you look at other programs, they’ve got good academics, too. But they’re not as academically inclined as we are. But by the same token, they want their basketball program at Xavier to have success. And they’re going to invest in it. Xavier’s goal athletically in basketball is to be one of the top teams in the country. Our goal is to try and compete (in the A-10) and competing is going to be cyclical, like a roller coaster. Change the coaches, do what you want, but you can bring Bobby Knight in here, and if you have these same things, their ability to recruit is going to be the same.”
Again, any surprises?
The real focus should be on comments made by Jeffrey Gray and Frank McLaughlin. Father McShane, Fordham’s President, was not quoted in the article. McLaughlin delivered his usual support for the program and commitment to the future, while Gray, the school’s Vice President of Student Affairs, said, “We don’t have the facilities we’d like to support our basketball team. But I don’t think anything will change for us in the short term from a facilities standpoint. We can’t change our physical infrastructure next week.”
Right. But as dorms, a library, a parking garage, and fields have been built and developed, it’s fair to expect an arena to enter the discussion. After all, Fordham joined the Atlantic 10 in 1995. Much has changed at Rose Hill since. The gym is still the gym.
To McLaughlin, the school’s Executive Director of Athletics, who said, “We like being associated with the Atlantic 10. I think the Atlantic 10 wants us to be successful because of the New York presence and the media market. Everyone here at Fordham, from top to bottom, wants us to be successful.”
That includes the fans. And they expect and deserve more.
I believe Whittenburg has done his part. In the six years he’s been at Rose Hill, he’s proven his allegiance to the university and he’s shown he can coach. His detractors were wrong to criticize his comments in the Daily News. They’re the same things they’ve been saying for years. Folks, Whittenburg is not the problem. He’s the most successful coach Fordham has had since joining the Atlantic 10. He’s also a quality guy who knows a thing or two about basketball.
The real need is for Father McShane, Jeffrey Grey, and Frank McLaughlin to start talking. Whittenburg aside, these three represent the public face of Fordham basketball. We need to hear from them. Not individually in a newspaper article, or in a random interview on the radio. The three need to be part of a public forum on Fordham basketball. Whittenburg needs to be there, the radio guys need to be there, and those of us who cover the team in print and online need to be there. And yes, fans should be invited as well. They deserve to hear and be heard.
It’s time.
Then, and only then, can the real story of Fordham basketball be told.
Posted in Basketball Commentary | Leave a Comment »