Fordham dropped to 2-17 on the year, 0-7 in the Atlantic 10, with an 80-73 loss to La Salle last night at the Rose Hill Gym.
The Rams kept it close right to the end, with a chance to tie the game on an Alberto Estwick 3-pointer with under a minute to play. But Estwick missed that shot and from there the Explorers held on to improve to 11-9, 3-3 in conference play.
From Joe DiBari’s game recap:
The game featured a match-up of two of the top freshmen in the Atlantic 10: Fordham’s Chris Gaston and La Salle’s Aaric Murray. Murray won the scoring battle, 24-21, but Gaston was better on the boards, 15-7, despite being limited to 31 minutes due to foul trouble. The double-double is the second straight and the 12th of the season for Gaston, the second most for an Atlantic 10 player this year.
“Aaric Murray is probably the best player I’ve seen in the Atlantic 10 since I’ve been here,” said Fordham head coach Jared Grasso. “But it came down to us not making our shots while La Salle did.”
La Salle entered the game leading the Atlantic 10 in rebounding margin, outrebounding opponents by an average of 6.2 rpg, but the Rams won the battle of the boards tonight, outrebounding the Explorers, 34-33, thanks to 15 boards from Gaston(21 points). It marked the fifth time in the seven conference games this year that Fordham outrebounded its opponent.
As has been the case for six of the past seven games, the Rams played a solid first half, leading by three at the break, 38-35, but their opponent came out and opened a second half lead before going on to a win.
“I was happy with the way we responded to their run in the second half,” Grasso said. “The guys competed hard all game and were right there at the end. This team is going to be good as long as they keep working hard.”
Read the entire article here.
Charles Costello







Rose Hill Under Attack Yet Again
Posted by Fordham SportsNet on January 15, 2010
BY CHARLES COSTELLO
It didn’t take long for the attack dogs to return. They are back, and while one of their favorite targets – Dereck Whittenburg – is gone, Frank McLaughlin & Co. remain. Look out Rose Hill, you’re under attack yet again.
The latest comes from Lenn Robbins in the New York Post. Robbins is an excellent writer of college sports, one of the best around. He also happens to be an articulate, insightful television commentator. He has a right to voice his opinions, and he certainly has credibility. But going after Fordham at this point comes across as being no better than kicking a dog when it’s down.
Writing in the Post, Robbins is critical of McLaughlin’s comments regarding the funding for a new arena. In the article, McLaughlin says, “We have room on campus. We could definitely build a facility. If there was a major donor who came forward, there is room on campus to do something.”
Robbins didn’t like that take. Here’s his response:
“A major donor?
Fordham should be its own donor; a decision that has to be made at the board of trustees/presidential level.”
In the article’s lead, Robbins asks, “What is Fordham thinking?” Sort of sets the tone for the article don’t you think?
Then, Robbins concludes the article by questioning Fordham’s coaching search, and in the process takes another jab at Fordham.
“McLaughlin can get a great coach simply because the opportunity to coach an Atlantic 10 team located smack in the middle of the best prep hoops in America is too good to resist for some. But it is irresistible because Fordham is an Atlantic 10 school with Division III facilities.”
And you wonder why the school kept quiet for the most part during that wave of media criticism last off-season. It seems that people find fault with everything McLaughlin, or anyone else at Fordham, says and does. If he speaks, they pounce on his words. If he doesn’t speak, they pounce on him for not speaking. At Rose Hill these days, you just can’t win.
Here’s another one of McLaughlin’s quotes that Robbins didn’t like:
“It’s not high on the priority list due to the economy,” McLaughlin said in the article, talking about a new arena.
Leading Robbins to ask once again: “What is Fordham thinking?”
Perhaps Fordham is thinking about more than just basketball. Now there is a novel mission for a university to embrace.
Yes, Rose Hill, you’re under attack yet again.
Posted in Basketball Commentary | 6 Comments »