Fordham SportsNet

Independent, Comprehensive Coverage of Fordham Sports

Archive for the ‘Basketball Commentary’ Category

Three Years for Grasso. Do It Now, Fordham

Posted by Fordham SportsNet on February 15, 2010

Jared Grasso deserves a three-year contract from Fordham, Charles Costello says.

BY CHARLES COSTELLO

Random thoughts on this President’s Day:

It’s time for Fordham to permanently name Jared Grasso its men’s basketball head coach. Immediately after he was named interim head coach back on December 3rd, I said that he should be given the job on a permanent basis. While I understand the university’s desire to conduct a national search, coaches-turned-broadcasters like Fran Fraschilla and Tim Welsh aren’t going to excite the masses. And Fordham isn’t in a position to make a run at a Rick Pitino, if he becomes available, or even a Bobby Knight, who is available but may not make himself available. Grasso is young and full of energy. His players like him and he’s begun to change the culture within the program. Give him a three-year contract and let him work with Chris Gaston and Lance Brown and whoever else he can convince to come play basketball at Fordham. Grasso is a great recruiter and insists that more top recruits are on their way. Think about it: This guy has convinced kids to come play basketball at Rose Hill. Given the state of the program, that’s quite an accomplishment. Most importantly, Grasso desperately wants the job. He believes that Fordham can be a 20-win team in the next couple of years. Someone this passionate about Fordham basketball, and this optimistic about the future of the program, who the school knows and trusts and who will come at the right price, should be given the job today. 

If you haven’t listened to Brian Clark’s play-by-play on WFUV (90.7 FM), then do yourself a favor and tune in. Clark is a senior at Fordham, and as the lead play-by-play guy for Fordham basketball and football, he’s a great listen. Accurate, informative, and entertaining, without being over-the-top, Clark is yet another young phenom to emerge out of Keating Hall.

Speaking of WFUV phenoms, have you heard/seen 1999 grad Connell McShane on the Imus in the Morning program? Connell, working for the Fox Business Channel, has become a big part of the show, and he’s excellent in his role as business reporter/Imus fave. Here is a recent exchange between Don Imus and Connell.

The One on One post-game show on Saturday was WFUV Sports at its best. An hour of game recap, commentary, and phone calls. Nobody is closer to the program than the sports department of WFUV, and that’s why we need more Fordham coverage from them. Their game coverage is great, and I understand the logic behind covering pro sports, but especially in the prime college months of September through March, they’d be providing a great service if they dedicated more of the One on One call-in-show to Fordham football and basketball. We can turn to WFAN (660 AM) for Giants and Yankee talk, but WFUV is the only place to go for Fordham sports.

I know this has nothing to do with Fordham, but Norm Roberts just had one of his best weeks at St. John’s. On Thursday, the Red Storm (formerly Redmen) beat Louisville at the Garden, and then last night they won at Notre Dame. At 14-10, 4-8 in the Big East, St. John’s at least has something to smile about. It may not save Roberts’ job, but those are two quality wins for the program.

One more nothing-to-do-with-Fordham comment: What’s happened to UConn? I can’t resist since I live in Husky Country here in Connecticut. Jim Calhoun returned on Saturday and the Connecticut Post (have you read my CT Post Jets Blog) put it best with its headline, “Dysfunctional Dogs.” Tonight, the Huskies are 10-point underdogs at Villanova.

Finally, I’ll be starting a new feature here on Fordham SportsNet, something along the lines of ”Reasons to be Proud of Fordham” or “Reasons to Root for Fordham.” More information to come, but for now, think Binghamton basketball.

Posted in Basketball Commentary | 3 Comments »

Reader E-Mail: Greg from Norwalk, Connecticut

Posted by Fordham SportsNet on February 5, 2010

CHARLES COSTELLO

I received an email the other day from a reader who had concerns about the direction of the Fordham men’s basketball program. I thought the email contained some legitimate comments and questions and I wanted to share them with you.

From Greg in Norwalk, CT:

“I graduated in ’85 and [it] appears the program is at the lowest point since it moved to the Patriot League. I wish you could do a story about whether or not Fordham belongs in the Atlantic 10.

I feel that we should go back to the MAAC. Our commitment to the A-10 is not where it needs to be and probably never will be. In the MAAC, we should be able to contend for the title and go to the NCAAs every 4-5 years or more. We have no shot at postseason play in the A-10. Our facilities, recruiting, coaching, and level of support from the administration, students and alumni is substandard.

I also miss the local rivalries playing Iona, Manhattan, Fairfield, and St. Peter’s in the MAAC. We hardly play those teams anymore.”

I told Greg that I would print his comments and offer my response. Here’s what I have to say:

First, a number of stories have recently been written about Fordham basketball, and some have focused on its membership in the Atlantic 10. Fordham SportsNet’s five-part exclusive series with Frank McLaughlin last April shed light on this topic and more. Knowing the vision of the administration, it’s clear that Fordham wants to be successful in the Atlantic 10, and it’s clear that the league wants Fordham to be successful, mainly due to the A-10′s desire to have a school from the New York market in its conference. Whether or not the university has done enough to convince the A-10, and its fans, that it has a plan in place for the long-term success of the program is another story. But remember, when the Rams went 18-12 in 2006-07, no one was questioning whether or not they belonged in the A-10.

Next – and I have to be honest here – I like the MAAC, and I think that’s where Fordham belongs. But when the school joined the A-10 in 1995, the conference had an opening and Fordham was looking to make a move out of the Patriot League. You can talk MAAC all you want, and even the Big East for that matter, but a conference has to be looking to expand and has to have an interest in including the school in order for a fit to be made. Remember, the Rams had their time in the MAAC before bolting for the Patriot League. Remember, too, that the A-10 is a step up from the MAAC.

Moving along, Fordham does have a shot at post-season play. I think most people felt the NIT was within reach entering the 2007-08 season. That would’ve been a good start. Don’t you think that the NIT would jump at the opportunity to include a New York City school in its tournament? A good start would be to win a few A-10 tournament games. It’s always possible to get on a roll in March and see where it takes you.

On we go. It’s hard for me to question those who question the facilities and administration, even though I disagree a lot of times with their criticism and tone. I support McLaughlin and Jeff Gray and Fr. McShane, but I can understand the fan frustration. They want a winner, and they’ve waited long enough. I’d argue that Fordham fans are too negative, but you can’t accuse them of being impatient.

As far as playing the local rivals, this can be done without a move to the MAAC. But I agree, I would love to see Fordham play Manhattan, Iona, St. John’s, Hofstra, Stony Brook, Fairfield, and Sacred Heart, etc. every year. Think about it, in the Atlantic 10, Fordham doesn’t have a geographic rival.

Good job by Greg raising some interesting arguments and asking legitimate questions. If you’d like me to address other topics or questions please email me at charlescostello@optonline.net and I’ll include your thoughts in future articles. Of course, you’re always welcome to simply leave a comment in the comments section of each story.

Posted in Basketball Commentary, Men's Basketball | Leave a Comment »

Rose Hill Under Attack Yet Again

Posted by Fordham SportsNet on January 15, 2010

BY CHARLES COSTELLO

It didn’t take long for the attack dogs to return. They are back, and while one of their favorite targets – Dereck Whittenburg – is gone, Frank McLaughlin & Co. remain. Look out Rose Hill, you’re under attack yet again.

The latest comes from Lenn Robbins in the New York Post. Robbins is an excellent writer of college sports, one of the best around. He also happens to be an articulate, insightful television commentator. He has a right to voice his opinions, and he certainly has credibility. But going after Fordham at this point comes across as being no better than kicking a dog when it’s down.

Writing in the Post, Robbins is critical of McLaughlin’s comments regarding the funding for a new arena. In the article, McLaughlin says, “We have room on campus. We could definitely build a facility. If there was a major donor who came forward, there is room on campus to do something.”

Robbins didn’t like that take. Here’s his response:

“A major donor?

Fordham should be its own donor; a decision that has to be made at the board of trustees/presidential level.”

In the article’s lead, Robbins asks, “What is Fordham thinking?” Sort of sets the tone for the article don’t you think?

Then, Robbins concludes the article by questioning Fordham’s coaching search, and in the process takes another jab at Fordham.

“McLaughlin can get a great coach simply because the opportunity to coach an Atlantic 10 team located smack in the middle of the best prep hoops in America is too good to resist for some. But it is irresistible because Fordham is an Atlantic 10 school with Division III facilities.”

And you wonder why the school kept quiet for the most part during that wave of media criticism last off-season. It seems that people find fault with everything McLaughlin, or anyone else at Fordham, says and does. If he speaks, they pounce on his words. If he doesn’t speak, they pounce on him for not speaking. At Rose Hill these days, you just can’t win.

Here’s another one of McLaughlin’s quotes that Robbins didn’t like:

“It’s not high on the priority list due to the economy,” McLaughlin said in the article, talking about a new arena.

Leading Robbins to ask once again: “What is Fordham thinking?”

Perhaps Fordham is thinking about more than just basketball. Now there is a novel mission for a university to embrace.

Yes, Rose Hill, you’re under attack yet again.

Posted in Basketball Commentary | 6 Comments »

Non-Conference Losses Continue to Plague Fordham

Posted by Fordham SportsNet on January 6, 2010

BY CHARLES COSTELLO

Fordham’s lack of success in the Atlantic 10 has been well documented. Since the Rams joined the conference for the 1995-96 basketball season, they’ve finished only two seasons at .500 or better. And only three times has Fordham been .500 or better in conference play. Perhaps most startling is the Rams’ poor non-conference record. In the past 15 seasons, Fordham is 71-115 in non-conference games (63-161 in conference play, 134-276 overall), including 2-10 the past two seasons. Here is a breakdown of Fordham’s non-conference record since the university became a member of the Atlantic 10:

1995-96: 2-9

1996-97: 5-6

1997-98: 4-7

1998-99: 7-4

1999-00: 7-6

2000-01: 8-5

2001-02: 4-8

2002-03: 1-11

2003-04: 3-9

2004-05: 5-8

2005-06: 7-9

2006-07: 8-6

2007-08: 6-7

2008-09: 2-10

2009-10: 2-10

Through this past Sunday’s games, Fordham’s non-conference opponents this year had a combined record of 85-70. Losses to Hampton (3-10) and Hartford (2-11) may hurt, but you have to consider that eight of Fordham’s non-conference opponents had .500 or better records, including St. John’s (10-4) and nationally-ranked Villanova (12-1). With that said, there are games on the schedule that you’d like to win regardless of your opponent’s record. Maine and Kennesaw State immediately come to mind.

Given the team’s struggles in November and December, it’s no wonder that Fordham has finished at .500 or better overall only twice since the 1991-92 season.

Posted in Basketball Commentary, Men's Basketball | 3 Comments »

Opportunity for No. 24 to be Rams’ No. 1

Posted by Fordham SportsNet on December 8, 2009

Brenton Butler (fordhamsports.com)

BY CHARLES COSTELLO

As the Daily News’ Sean Brennan pointed out earlier this season, it’s hard to find a guy easier to root for than Fordham’s Brenton Butler. 

The senior guard, who missed most of last season with a high ankle injury, and who missed time before this season started due to the flu, finds himself in a leadership role with the Rams. As one of only four seniors, and the only one so far to receive significant minutes, Butler may be the most important player on this team when you consider that Jio Fontan is now gone and Chris Gaston – Fordham’s leading scorer and rebounder - is only a freshman.

“I’m ready and it’s time,” Butler declared before the season started.

He was referring to getting back out on the court, accepting his role, and helping Fordham basketball rebound from a difficult 3-25 season. In his words and actions, Butler embraced all the characterstics of a leader. 

“I have to [be a leader] and I like it because I feel that a young team needs somebody to look up to and help motivate and follow,” Butler said. “I’m a leader by example. I work hard on and off the court. I’m always there for the guys if they need somebody to talk to about any situation. Obviously, because I was injured last year, I had to be more of a spokesperson than a leader by example because I wasn’t able to be out there. You’ll see me be more vocal out there this year.” 

That hasn’t been the problem, though.So far this season, Butler is averaging 11.3 points per game, but he’s shooting only 28.2% from the floor and 22.5% from 3-point range. As a team, the Rams are shooting just 33.9% from the floor, 20.7% from 3-point range, and 61.9% from the free throw line.

Butler appeared to hit rock bottom in Saturday’s loss to Bowling Green. He shot 0-for-13 from the floor, 0-for-9 from beyond the arc, scoring zero points in 27 minutes. Fordham desperately needs more production out of Butler.

Rest assured, though, the senior is motivated. After all, he remembers what it was like having to watch from the sideline a year ago.

“It’s really hard to explain because it’s just such a helpless feeling,” Butler said about watching his teammates and coaches struggle through one of the toughest seasons in the program’s history. “There’s nothing you can do. To not go through it with them was really tough. We all learned a lot about ourselves, about our team. Even though that’s something you don’t want to go through, it made us closer and makes us want to fight for each other even that much more.”

Now, the Rams, including Butler, need to put the ball in the basket.

Posted in Basketball Commentary, Men's Basketball | Leave a Comment »

Jared Grasso

Posted by Fordham SportsNet on December 5, 2009

Jared Grasso makes his debut as Fordham's interim head basketball coach tonight at the Rose Hill Gym. (fordhamsports.com)

BY CHARLES COSTELLO

The Jared Grasso Era officially gets underway tonight when the Rams host Bowling Green at the Rose Hill Gym. It will be the beginning of Grasso’s tryout. At the end of the season, perhaps before, Frank McLaughlin, Fr. McShane, the Board of Trustees, and whoever else has a say, will decide if Grasso stays or goes. That evaluation begins in earnest tonight. Here’s hoping Grasso ends up keeping this job for a long time.

Grasso was hired as an assistant coach by Dereck Whittenburg before the 2006-07 season. On Thursday, he was named interim head coach after Whittenburg was fired after six-plus seasons. Meanwhile, Fordham has begun a national coaching search that will include the 29-year-old Grasso.

We will hear from Grasso today when he has his first One on One interview as head coach (2:30 p.m., 90.7 FM). He is sure to say all the right things, both about Whittenburg and about his emotions as he takes over. Four and a half hours later, we’ll see him patrolling the sidelines for the first time. This has officially become his team.

Known mostly for his ability to recruit - somehow convincing high school stars to come play for a school that has not had much success - Grasso is highly respected throughout college basketball, and more importantly, in the Fordham community. In his new role, he’ll have to prove that he can coach these young players. And he’ll have to do it in uncertain times. An announcement on Jio Fontan, who for the second time this calendar year has expressed his desire to bolt Rose Hill, is expected in the next few days. Grasso is taking over a 1-4 team, a team that won three games all of last season, a team with its star point guard threatening to leave, and a team playing a schedule that includes the likes of St. John’s, Villanova, Dayton, and Xavier. It won’t be easy. This may be the toughest Division I coaching job out there.

Besides his ability to recruit, here’s what we know about Grasso: He is a basketball guy through and through, always has been. He played collegiately at Quinnipiac, served as an assistant there and before that at Hartford and before that he was a graduate assistant at Hofstra. His father was a coach. He is a true student of the game. Perhaps most importantly right now for Fordham, the players like and respect him. They will play hard for him. You can bet that if you asked those guys in that locker room who they wanted to replace Whittenburg, they’d all say Grasso.

Grasso deserves a shot. If he proves himself on this stage, Fordham should lock him up before the season ends. I understand Fordham’s motivation for beginning its search for a new coach. If it were me, though, I wouldn’t begin the search until the end of the season, if you even have to at that point. I would evaluate Grasso over the next couple of months and hope that he proves he’s up to the task. If I’m McLaughlin or McShane or any other decision-maker, I want Grasso to work out. He would be a great ambassador for the program and university. Better than bringing in someone from another program, or even a big name coach, let’s see what Grasso’s got. We could be looking at the next up-and-coming college coach. That would be huge for this program and school.

Twenty three games remain. It would be unfair to put a number on the games Grasso has to win in order to keep this job. It is not just about wins at this point. It is more about the pulse of the program, the environment in the locker room and on the court, and any enthusiasm Grasso can bring to the program.

Right now Grasso is like the backup quarterback on an NFL team. When the starter isn’t doing so well and the team is losing, the backup becomes the fan favorite, the most popular guy on the team. People cheer for the backup as he enters the game. The honeymoon doesn’t last very long.

Grasso will walk into the gym tonight to much applause and hope. Tonight, he becomes the starter.

Posted in Basketball Commentary, Men's Basketball | 2 Comments »

From Sportsmanship to Responsibility, What LeBron Can Learn from Dereck Whittenburg

Posted by Fordham SportsNet on June 6, 2009

LeBron James on the cover of Sports Illustrated (February 2, 2009).

LeBron James on the cover of Sports Illustrated (February 2, 2009).

BY CHARLES COSTELLO

The handshake is one of those everyday rituals that only sports can turn into a spectacle.

When Eric Mangini was coaching the Jets, his postgame handshakes with Patriots’ head coach Bill Belichick became back page news in the New York tabloids because of the tension between the two. Hockey players, after spending up to seven games of a playoff series beating the daylights out of each other, proceed slowly down the line at center ice, shaking hands with the very same opponents they tried to maul just moments earlier. Football players come together after Sunday afternoon battles to shake hands and embrace. Tennis players meet at the net for a post-match handshake, then go so far as to shake the hand of the chair umpire. And we know what a player-umpire confrontation can look like during a tennis match. John McEnroe anyone?

So last Saturday night after LeBron James and his Cavaliers went home for the summer following their loss to the Orlando Magic in Game 6 of the Eastern Conference Finals, the King made news. News that became bigger than anything he’d done with a basketball all season. That’s because James left the court without shaking hands and congratulating the Magic. And left Amway Arena without talking to the media. On Sunday, he offered this explanation:

“It’s hard for me to congratulate somebody after you just lose to them. I’m a winner. It’s not being a poor sport or anything like that. If somebody beats you up, you’re not going to congratulate them. That doesn’t make sense to me. I’m a competitor.”

What doesn’t make sense is James’ reasoning. First, I respect the fact that he’s a competitor. He wants to win. LeBron’s done just about everything right since being crowned King James back in high school, before he even started playing for money. Since entering the NBA, he’s done nothing but represent himself, the Cavaliers, and the league with class. But he’s wrong here. It’s good sportsmanship to congratulate your opponent, whether you beat them up or they beat you up.

Even William Rhoden, not one to frequently take issue with players, said in Tuesday’s New York Times that he expected more from James. This from Rhoden’s column:

“So, this is new-era sportsmanship as defined by King James: Winners don’t shake hands with their opponents after they lose; competitors storm off when the result doesn’t go their way.

So-called street credibility works both ways. You gain it by exhibiting a toughness critics may have thought you lacked, and you lose it by acting like a prima donna who has started to believe the corporate hype. You don’t knock the pieces off the chess table just before you’re checkmated.

Unless you’re the king.

…That’s fine, but when you lose a heartbreaking series, you have to go out with your guys and shake hands with the team that beat you. 

You can’t have it both ways. Even when you’re king.”

A Handshake Is Hardly Too Much to Ask, Even From a King (William C. Rhoden, New York Times, June 2, 2009)

Rhoden is Barry Bonds’ biggest defender in the media. He’s recently come out in support of Michael Vick. To the best of our knowledge and judgment, James never did steroids, never lied to a grand jury, and never sponsored dog fighting at his home. And yet Rhoden called him out on this one.

ESPN has been worshiping LeBron since his playing days at St. Vincent-St. Mary High School in Akron Ohio.

...and on the cover of ESPN The Magazine (May 4, 2009).

It’s a simple gesture. Shake hands and congratulate your opponent. It doesn’t make you any less of a competitor to do so after a loss. It’s too easy to do after a win. Both your actions and excuses were wrong, LeBron. We expect more from a King.

And then there’s the issue of James leaving Amway Arena without talking to the media. The face of the franchise. The face of the league. A man who’s going to make more money than anyone else in his next contract. A King. And apparently someone too big – you may say too small - to stand in front of the notepads and recorders following a season-ending loss.

Perhaps LeBron should consult Derek Jeter. The Yankee captain was given that title in 2003 largely because of his ability, and willingness, to answer the tough questions, to be the face of the franchise, win or lose. While Jeter’s done a lot of winning - four championships from 1996 to 2000 - there’ve been seven season-ending playoff losses this decade. After each one, Jeter was in front of the cameras and reporters. And maybe LeBron can pay a visit to Michael Jordan. Granted, Jordan did far more winning that losing. But anytime the Bulls did lose, Jordan didn’t run out of the arena like LeBron did. Always the competitor, Jordan appeared agitated yet determined following a loss. He was the face of the NBA. He understood what it meant to be Air Jordan.

And that brings me to Fordham. Head coach Dereck Whittenburg suffered through the most difficult season of his basketball career, as both a player and coach, in 2008-09. Three wins in 28 tries. Plenty of player discontent and off-the-court distractions. In his sixth season at Fordham, Whittenburg experienced it all. And yet, after every game, after heartbreaking defeats and blowout losses, the head coach, the leader of the team, sat in front of a Fordham banner with that night’s stat sheet in front of him, answering question after question. Or perhaps the post-game interview would be conducted in the coaches’ locker room, underneath the Rose Hill Gym. There, Whittenburg would try to explain how the game got away, how he was keeping his team focused and motivated. And believe me, when you experience a season like Fordham did, the questions get tougher and tougher. Still, he sat there and answered every last one.

You might be thinking that it’s part of his job, that win or lose he has a responsibility to face the media. And you’re right. But on two separate occasions this year, Xavier’s Sean Miller, now the head coach at Arizona and a guy everyone liked to hold up as the gold standard of Atlantic 10 coaches, blew off the media after losses. Keep in mind, Miller gladly met the media after each of the 27 wins.

Some in the media, fueled largely by an angry fan base, have gone after Whittenburg and the program quite hard this offseason. But from a media perspective, as someone who attended every home game and interviewed him after every game, you won’t find a coach who’s more generous with his time, who’s more candid with his responses. A man who doesn’t run from a challenge. This is the type of person we all should be rooting for.

Whittenburg likes to say that in times of adversity you learn about yourself and discover who your true supporters are. LeBron could learn a thing or two from Whittenburg, and other winners, who show their true character by the way they respond to losing.

(Charles Costello can be reached at charlescostello@optonline.net)

Copyright Note: All content appearing on http://fordhamsportsnet.com/ is property of Fordham SportsNet and protected by copyright laws. The cutting and pasting of content without our express consent is prohibited.

Posted in Basketball Commentary | 3 Comments »

Inside the Numbers: Mike Moore

Posted by Fordham SportsNet on May 16, 2009

Mike Moore (Photo courtesy of Joe DiBari)

Mike Moore (Photo courtesy of Joe DiBari)

BY CHARLES COSTELLO

Mike Moore made it official last week with word that he’d be making the move from the Bronx out to Long Island. As Fordham SportsNet reported on April 2, Moore, Fordham’s No. 2 scorer this past season, previously made it known that he’d be leaving Rose Hill at the end of the academic year. Moore announced last week that his new home will be in Hempstead, joining the Hofstra Pride with two years of eligibility remaining.

There’s no question that Moore was a key player for the Rams in 2008-09. Injuries to Brenton Butler and Chris Bethel, a lack of experience and offensive threats, and inconsistent play, left Fordham relying on Moore, along with freshman Jio Fontan, to provide offense. That he did. In 28 games, 23 as a starter, Moore averaged 12.8 points and 4.5 rebounds. Moore led the Rams with 42 three-pointers, and finished second with 126 field goals. The 6-5 sophomore guard averaged 27.7 minutes per game. Only Fontan played more minutes (34.6 per game), scored more points (15.3), and made more field goals (149) than Moore.

It’s important to remember how much the Rams relied on Moore this past season, how important he was to a team in need of scoring. But toward the end of the season, rumors began to circulate about the possibility of Moore leaving at the end of the year. Why? For starters, Moore may have seen the handwriting on the wall. With Chris Gaston, Lance Brown, and Brian Freeman highlighting an impressive recruiting class, and with the return of Brenton Butler, Moore was probably looking at a lesser role next year. That means fewer minutes, fewer shots, and fewer points. And remember, Moore didn’t win anybody over with his defense.

Truth be told, Moore is the type of player you typically find on a good college team. A guy who can come off the bench, or start if need be, and score. A player who, when on his game, has the potential to take over in spurts. Though his assists (1.0 per game) were low, his rebounding can’t be overlooked. Still, a game-by-game analysis of Moore’s season provides an intriguing look at a player whose statistics may only tell part of the story. Consider Moore’s season:

Game 1: Fordham vs Columbia; November 14, 2008

Fordham’s season gets off to a rough start with a disappointing 65-62 loss to the Lions. Moore scores four points, all in the first half. Only three field goal attempts for Moore, who fouls out with 8:03 to go and the Rams ahead, 51-46. At the time, Bethel and Butler are still in the lineup, and despite the fact that Fontan scores just two points in his college debut, Trey Blue scores 24 points and Fordham seems to have enough on offense even without Moore. But having the option to go to him down the stretch would have helped.

Game 2: Fordham at Villanova; November 17, 2008

Two points for Moore in Villanova’s 107-68 domination of the Rams. Hey, the Wildcats ended up in the Final Four. Moore only plays eight minutes, two in the second half, and shoots 1-for-6 from the floor. Not too much to say here about Moore, or the team for that matter.

Game 3: Fordham vs Manhattan; November 22, 2008

Before 2,592 at Rose Hill, Moore scores three points in 11 minutes. He plays just four minutes in the second half and doesn’t score. He also finds himself in foul trouble. The Jaspers top the Rams, 81-67.

Game 4: Fordham vs Princeton; November 26, 2008

Breakout game for Moore: 21 points, 6-of-14 shooting, nine made free throws in 10 attempts. The Rams lose 73-61 in an empty gym on the night before Thanksgiving, but Moore provides an early glimpse of what he’s capable of offensively.

Game 5: Fordham vs James Madison; November 30, 2008

Moore scores four points in 20 minutes in Fordham’s 73-53 loss to the Dukes.  Four missed 3-point attempts and 2-of-8 shooting from the floor mark an unimpressive night for Moore.

Game 6: Fordham at Hofstra; December 3, 2008

Fordham falls to the Pride, 60-40, though Moore scores 16 points, 11 in the second half. Three offensive rebounds and four 3-pointers for Moore in his second best game of the season to date. The Rams fall to 0-6 with the loss. Moore will eventually end up transferring to Hofstra.

Game 7: Fordham vs Lafayette; December 8, 2008

Moore scores 17 points, 12 coming in the final 14:03 with Fordham ahead by 20-plus points. Still, Moore shows additional signs of being a major offensive threat for the Rams, who win their first game of the season, 79-58.

Game 8: Fordham vs Fairfield; December 11, 2008

A heartbreaking loss to the Stags as Fairfield’s Lyndon Jordan knocks down a 3-pointer with :02 left for the 69-66 win. Moore scores 20, eight in the second half, but none in the game’s final 10:51.

Game 9: Fordham vs New Hampshire; December 23, 2008

With students home for Christmas break, the Rams win their second game of the year, a 60-56 victory over New Hampshire. Moore scores 19 points, 12 in the second half, hitting a big 3-pointer with 9:25 to play that gives Fordham a 49-44 lead. Later, with 4:06 to play, Moore pulls the Rams to within two, 53-51, with a layup. Moore plays 38 minutes and grabs six rebounds and four steals.

Game 10: Fordham vs Tennessee-Martin; December 28, 2008

Fordham trails the whole way, losing to the Skyhawks, 82-70. Moore scores 16 points, but 12 came in the second half with the Rams trailing by double digits for most of the half. Moore shoots just 3-of-16 from the floor, 2-of-9 from 3-point range.

Game 11: Fordham vs Florida International; December 29, 2008

Moore scores seven first-half points, but just two in the second half, and none in the game’s final 18:14. Fordham falls to 2-9 with the 63-55 loss to FIU. Moore takes eight shots in 25 minutes, and was a non-factor down the stretch, though the game was not as close as the final score may have indicated.

Game 12: Fordham at Bowling Green; January 3, 2009

In 15 minutes of second-half action, Moore does not score, and he finishes with six points for the game. Moore takes just one shot from the floor in the second half and misses a 3-pointer with 38 seconds left that would have cut the Falcons lead to three. Fordham loses to Bowling Green, 65-59.

Game 13: Fordham vs St. Bonaventure; January 7, 2009

Moore scores 17 points in Fordham’s 78-65 loss to the Bonnies. Moore has a strong game on the boards, grabbing nine rebounds, but fouls out late in the game after shooting 4-of-9 from the floor in the second half.

Game 14: Fordham vs Xavier; January 11, 2009

In a highly anticipated matchup with the nationally-ranked Musketeers, Moore scores just six points in 25 minutes. Moore’s 3-pointer with 15:25 to play caps a 20-4 run that cuts the Musketeers lead to one, though that’s as close as the Rams would get. That was also Moore’s last basket of the game. Moore takes just three shots from the floor in the second half. The Rams eventually fall to Xavier, 86-60.

Game 15: Fordham at Dayton; January 14, 2009

In a 72-71 loss to the Flyers, Moore scores 11 points, eight in the second half including a big 3-pointer with 9:37 left that gives the Rams a 55-53 lead. However, Moore would take just two more shots, missing on both, as the Rams lose at the buzzer on a Rob Lowery layup. This would have been a major upset. Dayton, after all, did win an NCAA tournament game. Moore, for the most part, is absent down the stretch when the Rams needed him most.

Game 16: Fordham at Rhode Island; January 18, 2009

Moore scores just two points in 22 minutes, shooting 1-of-9 from the floor and turning the ball over three times. His layup with 6:20 left in the game comes with the Rams down by 31. Rhode Island tops Fordham, 98-67.

Game 17:  Fordham vs Duquesne; January 25, 2009

Another blowout loss, 89-68, to the Dukes, despite an 18-point performance by Moore, who shoots just 1-of-7 from 3-point range and 5-of-14 from the floor.

Game 18: Fordham at St. Bonaventure; January 28, 2009

Best performance of the season by Fordham, on the road against a solid club. Where was Moore? Two points in 26 minutes. No points in 10 minutes of second-half action. Moore was a non-factor, shooting 1-of-6 from the floor in what turned out to be the Rams biggest win of the year, 67-65 over the Bonnies.

Game 19: Fordham vs Saint Louis; January 31, 2009

Moore plays 30 minutes and scores 14 points, 10 coming in the second half of Fordham’s 88-58 loss to the Billikens.

Game 20: Fordham at George Washington; February 7, 2009

Moore knocks down three 3-pointers in the second half and finishes with 15 points in the Rams 87-62 loss to the Colonials. Fordham trails by 33 at halftime and GW leads by as many as 41 in the second half. Not what you would call clutch 3′s by Moore.

Game 21: Fordham vs Massachusetts; February 11, 2009

Down by 25, Moore scores six points in the game’s final 1:51 as the Rams fall to UMass, 91-68. Moore finishes with 21 points, 13 in the second half. Fordham trails by 29 at halftime. Moore shoots 1-of-7 from 3-point range and 8-of-19 from the floor.

Game 22: Fordham at Xavier; February 14, 2009

Against the nationally-ranked Musketeers, Moore scores 24 points, 13 in the second half, and eight in the final 11:03 with Fordham trailing by as many as 37. The Rams fall to Xavier, 88-53.

Game 23: Fordham at Temple; February 18, 2009

Eight points in 30 minutes for Moore, who shoots 3-of-16 from the floor, as Fordham loses for the 20th time on the year, a 72-45 beating at Temple. Down 67-43 with 4:11 to go, Moore hits a 3-pointer, his only points of the second half.

Game 24: Fordham vs Rhode Island; February 21, 2009

Moore scores 28 points, 19 in the second half, 10 coming in the game’s final 10 minutes with Fordham trailing by 20 or more points. Moore shoots 9-of-20 from the floor and his 28 points are a career-high. Fordham falls to URI, 77-58.

Game 25: Fordham vs Richmond; February 25, 2009

Moore fouls out after scoring 25 points, 14 in the second half. He makes 9-of-9 free throws and shoots 7-of-11 from the floor. With his team trailing by double digits, Moore scores nine consecutive Ram points, but Richmond maintains their double-digit lead and eventually wins, 78-68.

Game 26: Fordham at Charlotte; February 28, 2009

The season is winding down and, as it turns out, so is Moore’s Fordham career. Twenty points in 35 minutes for Moore, five coming late in the game with Fordham trailing by by as many as 21. Fordham trails by only nine at the half, thanks in large part to Moore who scores a team-high 10 points. Charlotte tops the Rams, 73-53.

Game 27: Fordham at La Salle; March 4, 2009

Eleven points for Moore, but only four in the second half as the Explorers turn a seven-point halftime lead into a 79-59 win.

Game 28: Fordham vs Saint Joseph’s; March 7, 2009

What a way to go out. Moore doesn’t score and doesn’t play at all in the second half. In 14 minutes of action in the first half, he shoots 0-of-5 from the floor. Fordham loses, 71-54, and finishes the year 3-25, 1-15 in the A-10.

Season Totals

Moore averages 27.7 minutes, 12.8 points, 4.5 rebounds, and 1.0 assists per game. He shoots 126-of-326 (38 percent) from the floor, 42-of-139 (30 percent) from 3-point range, and 65-of-83 (78 percent) from the free-throw line. He finishes with 27 steals and 12 blocks. The sophomore starts 23 of 28 games.

Final Analysis

Moore can be a productive offensive player, one who showed he could hold his own offensively in the Atlantic 10. Having said that, a lot of his scoring came with his team trailing by what appeared to be insurmountable leads. Not all his fault of course, but how he fits into the system of a winning team is still a question. Moore may be best suited to come off the bench for a good team, and there’s no shame in that. His defense leaves a lot to be desired, and he was most likely looking at diminished minutes next season with a strong recruiting class coming in. It’ll be interesting to see how Tom Pecora uses him at Hofstra, and how his career unfolds on a team that went 21-11 last season, a team that’s been far more successful than Fordham’s been of late.

(Charles Costello can be reached via email at charlescostello@optonline.net)

Copyright Note: All content appearing on http://fordhamsportsnet.com/ is property of Fordham SportsNet and protected by copyright laws. The cutting and pasting of content without our express consent is prohibited.

Posted in Basketball Commentary, Men's Basketball | Leave a Comment »

Time for Fordham to Grant Fontan His Release

Posted by Fordham SportsNet on May 2, 2009

Is this the last we'll see of Jio Fontan in a Fordham uniform? (Photo courtesy of Joe DiBari)

Is this the last we'll see of Jio Fontan in a Fordham uniform? (Photo courtesy of Joe DiBari)

BY CHARLES COSTELLO

If Jio Fontan wants out of his Fordham scholarship, the university should do the right thing and let him go. Grant him his release and move on. At this point, it’s the best and only option for the school and the player.

Don’t get me wrong, losing Fontan would be a devastating blow to the program. Teams build around players like Fontan. A skilled and intelligent point guard who understands the game of basketball. And a good kid as well. This would be a monumental loss for Fordham. With Fontan in place for the next three years, and with the additions next year of highly-touted recruits such as Chris Gaston, Lance Brown, and Brian Freeman, not to mention the verbal commitment from Joel Wright for 2010, Rose Hill could be on the brink of a basketball resurgence. Coming off a 3-25 season, losing Fontan, unmistakably the team’s best player, would set the program back. A point guard would have to be found. And finding one as good as Fontan wouldn’t be an easy task.

But why would Fordham want to keep a player who doesn’t want to be here anymore? Albeit, a player recognized as the face of the program. As hard as it is to accept the fact that Fontan wants to go, and as difficult as it will be to pick up the pieces, given all that has transpired with Jio since the season ended, his departure seems inevitable.

This is college athletics circa 2009. Coaches leave and so do players. There’s no commitment or contract that can’t be broken. So while it’s disappointing to have arrived at this point, because Fontan is a talented player who could lead the Rams to their best Atlantic 10 days yet, Fordham needs to get on with it and allow Fontan to do the same. Let the young man pack his bags for another school. Boy, I’m still uneasy saying that.

All this talk of Fontan transferring began during the Big East Tournament in early March. Sean Brennan broke the story in his Daily News blog on March 11, and since then Fontan’s been in the news for all the wrong reasons. Adam Zagoria reported on zagsblog.com earlier this week that Fontan was denied his release by Fordham during a meeting on Tuesday. Zagoria reports that Fontan promised not to transfer to any Big East schools in the area (significant because Rutgers has been mentioned as the favorite to land Fontan, who is a native of Paterson, New Jersey). Reportedly, this was not the first time the university denied him his release. What happens now? Stay tuned.

If Fontan transfers, Fordham wouldn’t just be losing a great kid and a great basketball player, the school would be losing hope. Hope that teaming the new recruits with the star point guard would lead Fordham to the top of the Atlantic 10. Hope that Fontan would make Fordham basketball relevant again. I have to admit I’m shocked that this day has come. I thought Fontan would be the face of Fordham basketball through the 2011-12 season. I like Jio and I know how much Fordham needs him. How much a kid with that kind of talent, heart, and character can transform a program.

Imagine how head coach Dereck Whittenburg must feel right now. It’s one thing to lose Trey Blue and Mike Moore. But this is Jio Fontan. This is a member of the 2009 Atlantic 10 All-Rookie Team. This is the Rams’ leading scorer at 15.3 points per game. This is 132 assists out the door. Fontan’s that special player you find on the roster of every winning team. A young man Whittenburg can trust to bring it every day. A young man who appears to understand the game as much as Whittenburg understood the game 26 years ago when, as a player, he led North Carolina State to a national championship. A player who respects the game as much as Whittenburg, the coach, respects the game today. Whittenburg was always so proud of his freshman point guard, praising him after games for his toughness and his desire to win. It seemed like a winning combination.

The day Fontan leaves - if and when that happens - will be a dark one at Rose Hill. One of the darkest days the basketball program has ever had. How could one ever imagine that following a three-win season the news could get worse? That a special player would be leaving a struggling program.

Fordham will miss Fontan more than Fontan will miss Fordham. It would be a big loss for the program. Bigger than any of the 25 they just experienced. But just like Fontan seems to want to move on without Fordham, the university needs to move on without him.

(Charles Costello can be reached via email at charlescostello@optonline.net)

Copyright Note: All content appearing on http://fordhamsportsnet.com/ is property of Fordham SportsNet and protected by copyright laws. The cutting and pasting of content without our express consent is prohibited.

Posted in Basketball Commentary | 2 Comments »

Focused and Determined, Whittenburg Looking Forward to the Future

Posted by Fordham SportsNet on March 13, 2009

BY CHARLES COSTELLO

Some Fordham basketball observers have been obsessed lately with questions about the status of Dereck Whittenburg. I just don’t get it. Whittenburg’s the head coach here at Fordham, and he’ll be the head coach for the foreseeable future. And folks, that’s the way it should be.

There’s been chatter in the Fordham community about the need for a public statement by Frank McLaughlin, Fordham’s Executive Director of Athletics, regarding Whittenburg’s future. Why? Why would McLaughlin, a man who oversees 22 varsity sports at Fordham, take the time to state the obvious, that Whittenburg is coming back? It’s unreasonable to demand this. Does Saint Louis come out at the end of every basketball season and say that Rick Majerus is coming back? Do you hear Saint Joseph’s telling fans that Phil Martelli will be back? The answer is no. That’s not how schools operate. That’s not how professional teams operate. McLaughlin, as well as Father McShane, Fordham’s President, and Jeffrey Gray, the Vice President of Student Affairs, are busy men with far more urgent matters on their daily plates. Stating the obvious about a basketball coach who’s doing his job just isn’t part of their to-do list.

Whittenburg has a lucrative contract that takes him through the 2012-13 season. The school, still stung from the huge contract and buyout given to Bob Hill, isn’t going to let a guy go with four years remaining. Of course the main reason Whittenburg will be back is because he deserves to be back. He’s been here six years and he’s the most successful coach Fordham has had since the school joined the Atlantic 10. Eighteen wins in 2006-07 lifted expectations. Now the team is rebuilding around a star point guard and highly touted recruits coming in next year. He needs to be given the full length of his contract to work with this new group.

A three-win season would deflate the morale of many coaches. Not Whittenburg, whose dedication and commitment are to be commended. In fact, Whittenburg has never been so determined. When I talked to him last Saturday, right after Fordham’s 25-loss season concluded, he said that he’s looking forward to hitting the road immediately to recruit players to join the program. No time for reflection or looking back. Everything Whittenburg says carries an air of determination that’s both admirable and convincing.

“The only way I’m going to reflect [on this year] is that I’ll be on the next plane to go recruiting,” Whittenburg said. “We have to get a couple more quality guys to make sure our team is competitive next year and I think we can do that. I told the guys ‘this [season] is over.’ We’re going to continue to work, go on and look forward.”

It’s refreshing to listen to Whittenburg considering this may have been the toughest year of his basketball career, a storied career with success at every stop. A winner as a player at DeMatha High School and North Carolina State, and as a head coach at Wagner College, Whittenburg’s not used to losing, and he’s determined not to let a season like this happen again. The goal, he says, is to stay upbeat and to work hard. That goes for players and coaches.

“I have to [stay positive],” Whittenburg said. “I am the leader of the program so I have to show these guys the unshakable confidence that I still have. They’re going to carry the attitude that I carry. They’re going to look to me for leadership. It’s important how I react. Adversity is part of life.”

Throughout our talk, Whittenburg reiterated time and time again that his sole focus was on Fordham basketball.

“I’m so focused on my program,” Whittenburg said. “I’m only thinking about one thing right now. I’m thinking about Fordham University. Everything right now is going to be focused on the returning guys and it’s going to be [focused] around recruiting.”

Readers know how much I respect and admire Whittenburg. First, he’s a coach who talks to the media after every game. Go ask reporters covering Xavier what they thought of Sean Miller when he wouldn’t talk to them following losses this year. At the conclusion of every game this year, win or lose, blowout or buzzer beater, Whittenburg made himself available. That says a lot. Next, Whittenburg’s a winner and his players respect him for that. They also respect the fact that he demands that they be accountable, that they take advantage of every ounce of basketball talent they have. Just as important is the fact that he’s behind them in the classroom, that he understands the value of a Fordham education. Finally, he’s proven he can win as a coach, as his stint at Wagner and the job he did at Fordham a couple years ago proved.

When Whittenburg won 18 games two years ago so many were singing his praises that you would have thought Digger Phelps had returned to Rose Hill. After the past two seasons you get the feeling that Bob Hill would get a better seat at the dinner table. That says something about Fordham fans. And it ain’t pretty. 

Whittenburg knows basketball. In time, he’ll build this program. He certainly understands what it’s going to take to put Fordham basketball on the map.

“I love the challenge and I accept the challenge,” Whittenburg said. “We’re going to get there. I’m going to roll my sleeves up and get after it. That’s been me all my life. That’s just the way I am.”

Whittenburg’s here to stay. That’s good for him and even better for Fordham basketball.

(Charles Costello can be reached via email at charlescostello@optonline.net)

Posted in Basketball Commentary | 2 Comments »