CHARLES COSTELLO
I received an email the other day from a reader who had concerns about the direction of the Fordham men’s basketball program. I thought the email contained some legitimate comments and questions and I wanted to share them with you.
From Greg in Norwalk, CT:
“I graduated in ’85 and [it] appears the program is at the lowest point since it moved to the Patriot League. I wish you could do a story about whether or not Fordham belongs in the Atlantic 10.
I feel that we should go back to the MAAC. Our commitment to the A-10 is not where it needs to be and probably never will be. In the MAAC, we should be able to contend for the title and go to the NCAAs every 4-5 years or more. We have no shot at postseason play in the A-10. Our facilities, recruiting, coaching, and level of support from the administration, students and alumni is substandard.
I also miss the local rivalries playing Iona, Manhattan, Fairfield, and St. Peter’s in the MAAC. We hardly play those teams anymore.”
I told Greg that I would print his comments and offer my response. Here’s what I have to say:
First, a number of stories have recently been written about Fordham basketball, and some have focused on its membership in the Atlantic 10. Fordham SportsNet’s five-part exclusive series with Frank McLaughlin last April shed light on this topic and more. Knowing the vision of the administration, it’s clear that Fordham wants to be successful in the Atlantic 10, and it’s clear that the league wants Fordham to be successful, mainly due to the A-10′s desire to have a school from the New York market in its conference. Whether or not the university has done enough to convince the A-10, and its fans, that it has a plan in place for the long-term success of the program is another story. But remember, when the Rams went 18-12 in 2006-07, no one was questioning whether or not they belonged in the A-10.
Next – and I have to be honest here – I like the MAAC, and I think that’s where Fordham belongs. But when the school joined the A-10 in 1995, the conference had an opening and Fordham was looking to make a move out of the Patriot League. You can talk MAAC all you want, and even the Big East for that matter, but a conference has to be looking to expand and has to have an interest in including the school in order for a fit to be made. Remember, the Rams had their time in the MAAC before bolting for the Patriot League. Remember, too, that the A-10 is a step up from the MAAC.
Moving along, Fordham does have a shot at post-season play. I think most people felt the NIT was within reach entering the 2007-08 season. That would’ve been a good start. Don’t you think that the NIT would jump at the opportunity to include a New York City school in its tournament? A good start would be to win a few A-10 tournament games. It’s always possible to get on a roll in March and see where it takes you.
On we go. It’s hard for me to question those who question the facilities and administration, even though I disagree a lot of times with their criticism and tone. I support McLaughlin and Jeff Gray and Fr. McShane, but I can understand the fan frustration. They want a winner, and they’ve waited long enough. I’d argue that Fordham fans are too negative, but you can’t accuse them of being impatient.
As far as playing the local rivals, this can be done without a move to the MAAC. But I agree, I would love to see Fordham play Manhattan, Iona, St. John’s, Hofstra, Stony Brook, Fairfield, and Sacred Heart, etc. every year. Think about it, in the Atlantic 10, Fordham doesn’t have a geographic rival.
Good job by Greg raising some interesting arguments and asking legitimate questions. If you’d like me to address other topics or questions please email me at charlescostello@optonline.net and I’ll include your thoughts in future articles. Of course, you’re always welcome to simply leave a comment in the comments section of each story.
Reader E-Mail: Greg from Norwalk, Connecticut
Posted by Fordham SportsNet on February 5, 2010
CHARLES COSTELLO
I received an email the other day from a reader who had concerns about the direction of the Fordham men’s basketball program. I thought the email contained some legitimate comments and questions and I wanted to share them with you.
From Greg in Norwalk, CT:
“I graduated in ’85 and [it] appears the program is at the lowest point since it moved to the Patriot League. I wish you could do a story about whether or not Fordham belongs in the Atlantic 10.
I feel that we should go back to the MAAC. Our commitment to the A-10 is not where it needs to be and probably never will be. In the MAAC, we should be able to contend for the title and go to the NCAAs every 4-5 years or more. We have no shot at postseason play in the A-10. Our facilities, recruiting, coaching, and level of support from the administration, students and alumni is substandard.
I also miss the local rivalries playing Iona, Manhattan, Fairfield, and St. Peter’s in the MAAC. We hardly play those teams anymore.”
I told Greg that I would print his comments and offer my response. Here’s what I have to say:
First, a number of stories have recently been written about Fordham basketball, and some have focused on its membership in the Atlantic 10. Fordham SportsNet’s five-part exclusive series with Frank McLaughlin last April shed light on this topic and more. Knowing the vision of the administration, it’s clear that Fordham wants to be successful in the Atlantic 10, and it’s clear that the league wants Fordham to be successful, mainly due to the A-10′s desire to have a school from the New York market in its conference. Whether or not the university has done enough to convince the A-10, and its fans, that it has a plan in place for the long-term success of the program is another story. But remember, when the Rams went 18-12 in 2006-07, no one was questioning whether or not they belonged in the A-10.
Next – and I have to be honest here – I like the MAAC, and I think that’s where Fordham belongs. But when the school joined the A-10 in 1995, the conference had an opening and Fordham was looking to make a move out of the Patriot League. You can talk MAAC all you want, and even the Big East for that matter, but a conference has to be looking to expand and has to have an interest in including the school in order for a fit to be made. Remember, the Rams had their time in the MAAC before bolting for the Patriot League. Remember, too, that the A-10 is a step up from the MAAC.
Moving along, Fordham does have a shot at post-season play. I think most people felt the NIT was within reach entering the 2007-08 season. That would’ve been a good start. Don’t you think that the NIT would jump at the opportunity to include a New York City school in its tournament? A good start would be to win a few A-10 tournament games. It’s always possible to get on a roll in March and see where it takes you.
On we go. It’s hard for me to question those who question the facilities and administration, even though I disagree a lot of times with their criticism and tone. I support McLaughlin and Jeff Gray and Fr. McShane, but I can understand the fan frustration. They want a winner, and they’ve waited long enough. I’d argue that Fordham fans are too negative, but you can’t accuse them of being impatient.
As far as playing the local rivals, this can be done without a move to the MAAC. But I agree, I would love to see Fordham play Manhattan, Iona, St. John’s, Hofstra, Stony Brook, Fairfield, and Sacred Heart, etc. every year. Think about it, in the Atlantic 10, Fordham doesn’t have a geographic rival.
Good job by Greg raising some interesting arguments and asking legitimate questions. If you’d like me to address other topics or questions please email me at charlescostello@optonline.net and I’ll include your thoughts in future articles. Of course, you’re always welcome to simply leave a comment in the comments section of each story.
Posted in Basketball Commentary, Men's Basketball | Leave a Comment »